AFTL-FAQ Maintainer
2003-10-29 18:57:08 UTC
I see that the Dupas worshippers are at it again....
Let me straighten things out again with the TRUTH, and DUMBASS and his
worshippers cna all be thrown in Prison when the lawsuit hits
Earthlink.
Traci Lords Videos are NOT ILLEGAL in the USA, there were too many of
them, etc., these are the kinds of things you hear.
They are produced in foreign countries, and are Legally imported into
this country, all my RETAIL tapes and DVDs have been imported into the
US, all packages have been opened and inspected by US Customs and
NOTHING has ever been seized or destroyed, so that proves that Dupas's
cries to inform US Customs will do nothing.
Dupas and his worshippers claim that HIS ILLEGAL FAQ is the one for
the newsgroup, since it is not approved by usenet admin, is not on the
faq server, etc., it is not. Dupas is the one that claims these
videos are illegal, which is why he refuses to tell anyone where you
can supposedly buy them, yet Dupas and his worshippers post the
binaries, images, etc., to these newsgroups, where once they are
viewed on your computer screen makes you supposedly guilty of viewing
this so-called child porn.
AT no time have I or anyone else ever said we would turn over any
orders for videos to the FBI, this is a common LIE made up by Dupas
(Dumbass) and his worshippers like King of SPAMMERS, BJ Nash.
The ONLY thing I ever said, was that for those who continue to harass
me and attack me in these newsgroups, if you order any tapes from me,
I will send notice to your State Revenue department that you are
buying products, and that you MUST claim them on your State Tax Forms
and pay the tax on the items.
Let's get into the REAL TRUTH here...
Kristofer Danner, who falsely signed a legal document claiming to not
be involved with law enforcement officers, logged onto my computer BBS
and placed an order for Scientific Atlanta 8600 Test Chips. The
documentation and the legal agreement he signed, stated that these
chips are for testing purposes only and are not to be used to receive
unauthorized cable programming. I was selling DBS Direct Broadcast
Digital Satellite Dishes and Receivers in competition with our local
cable company.
The Illinois State Police came to my house, seized all my computer
equipment, etc., stating and I quote "That these are being used to
receive unauthorized cable programming". NOTE: It is impossible to
receive any cable programming on a computer unless you have a TV card
in the computer, which I do NOT.
The State Police when seizing this material asked, since they found
Adult Material, if I had any Child Porn, to which I replied, all I
have are Traci Lords Material... They did seize some of the Traci
Material.....
After about 2 weeks they returned to me items that they said were
obviously not in any violation of the law, which included all the
Traci Lords material....
Cable Theft if proven is a $250.00 fine for the first offense...
Child Porn is a $25,000.00 fine and 25 years in prison for the first
offense.....
After 1 year, they returned everything to me, except my cable boxes,
claiming they destroyed them.
I did not have Cable at the time of this incident. I now subscribe to
Digital Cable.
The FCC says it is LEGAL for cable users to own their own equipment.
My cable boxes that were sitting in storage, having not been used for
over 10 years were stolen from me and destroyed. I paid my cable
company when I subscribed to cable, $600.00 for each of those cable
boxes.
You decide for yourself. They couldn't prosecute me on a $250.00
fine, even though without cable even being connected to my house, they
could never prove I was receiving unauthorized cable. Since they
couldn't receive any TV programming with my computer, they couldn't
have even proven I was using that to steal cable.
They had in their possession images of Traci Lords which were
supposedly taken when she was under the age of 18. They returned
these to me.
Decide for yourself. Which is more ILLEGAL? Something that can only
be prosecuted for $250.00? Something that could be prosecuted for
$25,000.00 and 25 years in prison?
The Illinois State Police obviously could NOT PROVE any ILLEGAL
activity.
You can come to Decatur, Illinois, and I can give you the name and
addresses of 2 Video Rental Stores that Stock and Rent most all of
Traci Lord's Adult Movies.
US Customs has no problem with the import of Traci Lords Videos and
DVDs into this country. They are being re-released in countries such
as France, England, etc., where the LAWS are STRICTER than the US.
You MUST be 21 or older to appear in those kind of videos, images,
etc., in those countries, in the US where the Federal Law is 21, they
let the States decide, and the legal age in most states is NOT 18 as
you may think, but primarily 16, and in a few states 15 and 14 are the
legal age of consent for that type of material.
They had a case in Kentucky where a 16 year old girl was gotten
pregnant and the parents were suing the parents of the 16 year old boy
who fathered the child for violating the law for rape. The Judge
ruled that since both children were 16, which is the Legal Age of
Consensual Sex, there was no law broken.
As an attorney told me these laws were not in effect when Traci made
her films, the law enacted only required the models prove they were of
legal age, Traci did that and was in compliance of the law, Alexandria
Quinn did the same thing in the 1990's, a new law was passed, and the
attorney sais, these laws are not grandfathered....
In the early years movies were made, Adult films from 1907-1960's,
these films are chronicled and there was NO requirement for proof of
age in these films, they are all still legally available. ONe of
these films starring a stripper known as Candy Barr, was 15 years old
when she made the porn film, and she started stripping at age 14. You
can buy this entire x rated film on a compilation of 50's stag films,
and this title is still available today.
The laws can not be grandfathered...
Early films show children that look like they are 5-6 years old
playing with the womans breasts while she is having sex with others,
yet these films are not illegal, since there was no age laws back then
when they were made....
Let me straighten things out again with the TRUTH, and DUMBASS and his
worshippers cna all be thrown in Prison when the lawsuit hits
Earthlink.
Traci Lords Videos are NOT ILLEGAL in the USA, there were too many of
them, etc., these are the kinds of things you hear.
They are produced in foreign countries, and are Legally imported into
this country, all my RETAIL tapes and DVDs have been imported into the
US, all packages have been opened and inspected by US Customs and
NOTHING has ever been seized or destroyed, so that proves that Dupas's
cries to inform US Customs will do nothing.
Dupas and his worshippers claim that HIS ILLEGAL FAQ is the one for
the newsgroup, since it is not approved by usenet admin, is not on the
faq server, etc., it is not. Dupas is the one that claims these
videos are illegal, which is why he refuses to tell anyone where you
can supposedly buy them, yet Dupas and his worshippers post the
binaries, images, etc., to these newsgroups, where once they are
viewed on your computer screen makes you supposedly guilty of viewing
this so-called child porn.
AT no time have I or anyone else ever said we would turn over any
orders for videos to the FBI, this is a common LIE made up by Dupas
(Dumbass) and his worshippers like King of SPAMMERS, BJ Nash.
The ONLY thing I ever said, was that for those who continue to harass
me and attack me in these newsgroups, if you order any tapes from me,
I will send notice to your State Revenue department that you are
buying products, and that you MUST claim them on your State Tax Forms
and pay the tax on the items.
Let's get into the REAL TRUTH here...
Kristofer Danner, who falsely signed a legal document claiming to not
be involved with law enforcement officers, logged onto my computer BBS
and placed an order for Scientific Atlanta 8600 Test Chips. The
documentation and the legal agreement he signed, stated that these
chips are for testing purposes only and are not to be used to receive
unauthorized cable programming. I was selling DBS Direct Broadcast
Digital Satellite Dishes and Receivers in competition with our local
cable company.
The Illinois State Police came to my house, seized all my computer
equipment, etc., stating and I quote "That these are being used to
receive unauthorized cable programming". NOTE: It is impossible to
receive any cable programming on a computer unless you have a TV card
in the computer, which I do NOT.
The State Police when seizing this material asked, since they found
Adult Material, if I had any Child Porn, to which I replied, all I
have are Traci Lords Material... They did seize some of the Traci
Material.....
After about 2 weeks they returned to me items that they said were
obviously not in any violation of the law, which included all the
Traci Lords material....
Cable Theft if proven is a $250.00 fine for the first offense...
Child Porn is a $25,000.00 fine and 25 years in prison for the first
offense.....
After 1 year, they returned everything to me, except my cable boxes,
claiming they destroyed them.
I did not have Cable at the time of this incident. I now subscribe to
Digital Cable.
The FCC says it is LEGAL for cable users to own their own equipment.
My cable boxes that were sitting in storage, having not been used for
over 10 years were stolen from me and destroyed. I paid my cable
company when I subscribed to cable, $600.00 for each of those cable
boxes.
You decide for yourself. They couldn't prosecute me on a $250.00
fine, even though without cable even being connected to my house, they
could never prove I was receiving unauthorized cable. Since they
couldn't receive any TV programming with my computer, they couldn't
have even proven I was using that to steal cable.
They had in their possession images of Traci Lords which were
supposedly taken when she was under the age of 18. They returned
these to me.
Decide for yourself. Which is more ILLEGAL? Something that can only
be prosecuted for $250.00? Something that could be prosecuted for
$25,000.00 and 25 years in prison?
The Illinois State Police obviously could NOT PROVE any ILLEGAL
activity.
You can come to Decatur, Illinois, and I can give you the name and
addresses of 2 Video Rental Stores that Stock and Rent most all of
Traci Lord's Adult Movies.
US Customs has no problem with the import of Traci Lords Videos and
DVDs into this country. They are being re-released in countries such
as France, England, etc., where the LAWS are STRICTER than the US.
You MUST be 21 or older to appear in those kind of videos, images,
etc., in those countries, in the US where the Federal Law is 21, they
let the States decide, and the legal age in most states is NOT 18 as
you may think, but primarily 16, and in a few states 15 and 14 are the
legal age of consent for that type of material.
They had a case in Kentucky where a 16 year old girl was gotten
pregnant and the parents were suing the parents of the 16 year old boy
who fathered the child for violating the law for rape. The Judge
ruled that since both children were 16, which is the Legal Age of
Consensual Sex, there was no law broken.
As an attorney told me these laws were not in effect when Traci made
her films, the law enacted only required the models prove they were of
legal age, Traci did that and was in compliance of the law, Alexandria
Quinn did the same thing in the 1990's, a new law was passed, and the
attorney sais, these laws are not grandfathered....
In the early years movies were made, Adult films from 1907-1960's,
these films are chronicled and there was NO requirement for proof of
age in these films, they are all still legally available. ONe of
these films starring a stripper known as Candy Barr, was 15 years old
when she made the porn film, and she started stripping at age 14. You
can buy this entire x rated film on a compilation of 50's stag films,
and this title is still available today.
The laws can not be grandfathered...
Early films show children that look like they are 5-6 years old
playing with the womans breasts while she is having sex with others,
yet these films are not illegal, since there was no age laws back then
when they were made....