AFTL-FAQ Maintainer
2004-04-06 15:57:19 UTC
Glenn Chartrand has done it for the LAST time today.
For those reading his Off-Topic posts here;s the latest newsflash:
Glenn Chartrand sent emails to all my email accounts again today,
calling me a stalker saying I am sending him obscene email, etc..
I have in my JUNK and IN Mailbox over 1158 Emails from Glenn
Chartrands email addresses, they close one, he opens another...
Today Glenn Chartrand said that Rodney Miller of the Illinois State
Police told him that I was a Homosexual, etc..
So what did I do?
I forwarded his latest EMAIL to the Illinois State Police. I told
them I DEMAND the immediate Termination of Rodney Miller for hsi
Libel, Slander and Defamation of Character.
I'm sure Internal Affairs at the Illinois State Police will take this
email very SERIOUSLY!!
Guess what, I'm pretty sure Rodney Miller never said any such thing,
so when the Royal Canadian Mounted Police get contacted by the
Illinois State Police that Glenn Chartrand is NOW Libeling a State
Police Officer, maybe those STUPID IGNORANT CANADIAN MOUNTIES will
FINALLY BREAK DOWN GLENN CHARTRANDS DOOR, SEIZE ALL HIS CHILD PORN,
AND THEN TURN OVER THE LIST OF PURCHASERS OF HIS CHILD PORN TO THE
PROPER CUSTOMS OFFICIALS AND MORE DOORS WILL GET BROKEN DOWN!!!!
Glenn Chartrand is TRYING to IMPOSE his SATANIC LIFESRTLE ON ME< he
does searches in google for Child Porn, Beastiality, Gay, etc., and
sends these search engine inquiries to me. He, Slavetrainer, Dupas,
Kristofer Danner and BJ Nash are all forging my email addresses and
subscribing me to GAY email lists.
I do NOT CARE about their SICK, PERVERTED, SATANIC LIFESTYLE!!!
They can STICK WITH THEIR OWN KIND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This newsgroup is for discussions about Traci Lords ONLY!!!!!!
The ONLY FAQ approved by usenet for these newsgroups is MINE, which
was written before dupas came along and stole it and made his own...
Slavetrainer keeps posting ILLEGAL links in this newsgroup to that
ILLEGAL FAQ...
MY FAQ clearly states these newsgroups are for the discussion of Traci
Lords ONLY!!!!
Apparently dupas and his BUTT BUDDIES, have in their FAQ that you can
post about anything you want a slong as you Slander, Libel, Defame,
and cause the REAL FAQ Maintainer to LOSE INCOME!!!
I DO NOT OWN A PORN BUSINESS!!!!!! I do NOT HIDE behind the identity
of AFTL-FAQ MAINTAINER. That is MY TITLE as the Traci Lords FAQ
Maintainer. The FAQ has all my information, my name, my address,
etc..
My Businesses are Computer Hardware and Software sales and building
custom computers, and selling Personal Care, Health Crae, Automotive
Products, and Digital Satellite Systems.
I am TIRED of having my GOOD NAME Libeled and cause me to LOSE
Business because of FELON CRIMINALS NAMED: Glenn Chartrand,
Slavetrainer, Dupas, Kristofer D Danner and BJ Nash.
I DARE ANY USER OF THIS NEWSGROUP to go to the ONLINE DATABASE, PAY
the FEE and do a FELON SEARCH for Convicted Felons, and LOSE their
money when they FIND OUT that I HAVE NEVER BEEN CONVICTED OF ANY
FELONY, and there are NO CRIMINAL CHARGES EVER FILED AGAINST ME!!!!!
Glenn Chartrand and the others like to do what they can because they
are losing buisness because I'm getting their emails shut down!!!
Glenn Chartrand sends one email calling me a stalker...
I HAVE FORWARDED TO THE ABUSE DEPARTMENTS OF ALL HIS SERVERS, NOT ONE,
NOT TWO, BUT ONE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED FIFTY EIGHT OBSCENE, HARASSING
EMAILS, AND THE LAW IS CLEAR:
Illinois Stalking Law
Public Act 92-0199
SB233 Enrolled LRB9207519ARsb AN ACT concerning criminal law.
Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, represented in
the General Assembly: Section 5. The Criminal Code of 1961 is amended
by adding Section 12-7.5 as follows: (720 ILCS 5/12-7.5 new) Sec.
12-7.5. Cyberstalking.
(a) A person commits cyberstalking when he or she, knowingly and
without lawful justification, on at least 2 separate occasions,
harasses another person through the use of electronic communication
and:
(1) at any time transmits a threat of immediate or future bodily harm,
sexual assault, confinement, or restraint and the threat is directed
towards that person or a family member of that person, or
(2) places that person or a family member of that person in reasonable
apprehension of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault,
confinement, or restraint.
(b) As used in this Section: "Harass" means to engage in a knowing and
willful course of conduct directed at a specific person that alarms,
torments, or terrorizes that person. "Electronic communication" means
any transfer of signs, signals, writings, sounds, data, or
intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire,
radio, electronmagnetic, photoelectric, or photo-optical system.
"Electronic communication" includes transmissions by a computer
through the Internet to another computer.
(c) Sentence. Cyberstalking is a Class 4 felony. A second or
subsequent conviction for cyberstalking is a Class 3 felony. Section
99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon becoming law. Passed in
the General Assembly May 08, 2001. Approved August 01, 2001.
CRIMINAL OFFENSES
(720 ILCS 135/) Harassing and Obscene Communications Act.
(720 ILCS 135/0.01) (from Ch. 134, par. 16.3h)
Sec. 0.01. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Harassing and
Obscene Communications Act.
(Source: P.A. 90-578, eff. 6-1-98.)
(720 ILCS 135/1) (from Ch. 134, par. 16.4)
Sec. 1. Any person in this State who sends messages or uses
language or terms which are obscene, lewd or immoral with the intent
to offend by means of or while using a telephone or telegraph
facilities, equipment or wires of any person, firm or corporation
engaged in the transmission of news or messages between states or
within the State of Illinois is guilty of a Class B misdemeanor. The
use of language or terms which are obscene, lewd or immoral is prima
facie evidence of the intent to offend.
(Source: P.A. 77-2620.)
(720 ILCS 135/1-1) (from Ch. 134, par. 16.4-1)
Sec. 1-1. Harassment by telephone). Harassment by telephone is use
of telephone communication for any of the following purposes:
(1) Making any comment, request, suggestion or
proposal which is obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy or indecent
with an intent to offend; or
(2) Making a telephone call, whether or not
conversation ensues, with intent to abuse, threaten or harass any
person at the called number; or
(3) Making or causing the telephone of another
repeatedly to ring, with intent to harass any person at the
called number; or
(4) Making repeated telephone calls, during which
conversation ensues, solely to harass any person at the called
number; or
(4.1) Making a telephone call or knowingly inducing
a person to make a telephone call for the purpose of harassing
another person who is under 13 years of age, regardless of whether the
person under 13 years of age consents to the harassment, if the
defendant is at least 16 years of age at the time of the commission of
the offense; or
(5) Knowingly permitting any telephone under one's
control to be used for any of the purposes mentioned herein.
Every telephone directory published for distribution to members of
the general public shall contain a notice setting forth a summary of
the provisions of this Section. Such notice shall be printed in type
which is no smaller than any other type on the same page and shall be
preceded by the word "WARNING". All telephone companies in this State
shall cooperate with law enforcement agencies in using their
facilities and personnel to detect and prevent violations of this Act.
(Source: P.A. 91-878, eff. 1-1-01.)
(720 ILCS 135/1-2)
Sec. 1-2. Harassment through electronic communications.
(a) Harassment through electronic communications is the use of
electronic communication for any of the following purposes:
(1) Making any comment, request, suggestion or
proposal which is obscene with an intent to offend;
(2) Interrupting, with the intent to harass, the
telephone service or the electronic communication service of any
person;
(3) Transmitting to any person, with the intent to
harass and regardless of whether the communication is read in its
entirety or at all, any file, document, or other communication which
prevents that person from using his or her telephone service or
electronic communications device;
(3.1) Transmitting an electronic communication or
knowingly inducing a person to transmit an electronic
communication for the purpose of harassing another person who is under
13 years of age, regardless of whether the person under 13 years of
age consents to the harassment, if the defendant is at least 16 years
of age at the time of the commission of the offense;
(4) Threatening injury to the person or to the
property of the person to whom an electronic communication is
directed or to any of his or her family or household members; or
(5) Knowingly permitting any electronic
communications device to be used for any of the purposes
mentioned in this subsection (a).
(b) As used in this Act:
(1) "Electronic communication" means any transfer of
signs, signals, writings, images, sounds, data or intelligence of
any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio,
electromagnetic, photoelectric or photo-optical system.
(2) "Family or household member" includes spouses,
former spouses, parents, children, stepchildren and other persons
related by blood or by present or prior marriage, persons who share or
formerly shared a common dwelling, persons who have or allegedly share
a blood relationship through a child, persons who have or have had a
dating or engagement relationship, and persons with disabilities and
their personal assistants. For purposes of this Act, neither a casual
acquaintanceship nor ordinary fraternization between 2 individuals in
business or social contexts shall be deemed to constitute a dating
relationship.
(Source: P.A. 90-578, eff. 6-1-98; 91-878, eff. 1-1-01.)
(720 ILCS 135/1-3)
Sec. 1-3. Evidence inference. Evidence that a defendant made
additional telephone calls or engaged in additional electronic
communications after having been requested by a named complainant or
by a family or household member of the complainant to stop may be
considered as evidence of an intent to harass unless disproved by
evidence to the contrary.
(Source: P.A. 90-578, eff. 6-1-98.)
(720 ILCS 135/1-4)
Sec. 1-4. Psychiatric examination. The court may order any person
convicted under this Act to submit to a psychiatric examination.
(Source: P.A. 90-578, eff. 6-1-98.)
(720 ILCS 135/2) (from Ch. 134, par. 16.5)
Sec. 2. Sentence.
(a) Except as provided in subsection (b), a person who violates
any of the provisions of Section 1, 1-1, or 1-2 of this Act is guilty
of a Class B misdemeanor. Except as provided in subsection (b), a
second or subsequent violation of Section 1, 1-1, or 1-2 of this Act
is a Class A misdemeanor, for which the court shall impose a minimum
of 14 days in jail or, if public or community service is established
in the county in which the offender was convicted, 240 hours of public
or community service.
(b) In any of the following circumstances, a person who violates
Section 1, 1-1, or 1-2 of this Act shall be guilty of a Class 4
felony:
(1) The person has 3 or more prior violations in the
last 10 years of harassment by telephone under Section 1-1 of
this Act, harassment through electronic communications under Section
1-2 of this Act, or any similar offense of any state;
(2) The person has previously violated the
harassment by telephone provisions of Section 1-1 of this Act or
the harassment through electronic communications provisions of Section
1-2 of this Act or committed any similar offense in any state with the
same victim or a member of the victim's family or household;
(3) At the time of the offense, the offender was
under conditions of bail, probation, mandatory supervised release
or was the subject of an order of protection, in this or any other
state, prohibiting contact with the victim or any member of the
victim's family or household;
(4) In the course of the offense, the offender
threatened to kill the victim or any member of the victim's
family or household;
(5) The person has been convicted in the last 10
years of a forcible felony as defined in Section 2-8 of the
Criminal Code of 1961; or
(6) The person violates paragraph (4.1) of Section
1-1 or paragraph (3.1) of subsection (a) of Section 1-2.
(Source: P.A. 90-578, eff. 6-1-98; 91-878, eff. 1-1-01.)
For those reading his Off-Topic posts here;s the latest newsflash:
Glenn Chartrand sent emails to all my email accounts again today,
calling me a stalker saying I am sending him obscene email, etc..
I have in my JUNK and IN Mailbox over 1158 Emails from Glenn
Chartrands email addresses, they close one, he opens another...
Today Glenn Chartrand said that Rodney Miller of the Illinois State
Police told him that I was a Homosexual, etc..
So what did I do?
I forwarded his latest EMAIL to the Illinois State Police. I told
them I DEMAND the immediate Termination of Rodney Miller for hsi
Libel, Slander and Defamation of Character.
I'm sure Internal Affairs at the Illinois State Police will take this
email very SERIOUSLY!!
Guess what, I'm pretty sure Rodney Miller never said any such thing,
so when the Royal Canadian Mounted Police get contacted by the
Illinois State Police that Glenn Chartrand is NOW Libeling a State
Police Officer, maybe those STUPID IGNORANT CANADIAN MOUNTIES will
FINALLY BREAK DOWN GLENN CHARTRANDS DOOR, SEIZE ALL HIS CHILD PORN,
AND THEN TURN OVER THE LIST OF PURCHASERS OF HIS CHILD PORN TO THE
PROPER CUSTOMS OFFICIALS AND MORE DOORS WILL GET BROKEN DOWN!!!!
Glenn Chartrand is TRYING to IMPOSE his SATANIC LIFESRTLE ON ME< he
does searches in google for Child Porn, Beastiality, Gay, etc., and
sends these search engine inquiries to me. He, Slavetrainer, Dupas,
Kristofer Danner and BJ Nash are all forging my email addresses and
subscribing me to GAY email lists.
I do NOT CARE about their SICK, PERVERTED, SATANIC LIFESTYLE!!!
They can STICK WITH THEIR OWN KIND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This newsgroup is for discussions about Traci Lords ONLY!!!!!!
The ONLY FAQ approved by usenet for these newsgroups is MINE, which
was written before dupas came along and stole it and made his own...
Slavetrainer keeps posting ILLEGAL links in this newsgroup to that
ILLEGAL FAQ...
MY FAQ clearly states these newsgroups are for the discussion of Traci
Lords ONLY!!!!
Apparently dupas and his BUTT BUDDIES, have in their FAQ that you can
post about anything you want a slong as you Slander, Libel, Defame,
and cause the REAL FAQ Maintainer to LOSE INCOME!!!
I DO NOT OWN A PORN BUSINESS!!!!!! I do NOT HIDE behind the identity
of AFTL-FAQ MAINTAINER. That is MY TITLE as the Traci Lords FAQ
Maintainer. The FAQ has all my information, my name, my address,
etc..
My Businesses are Computer Hardware and Software sales and building
custom computers, and selling Personal Care, Health Crae, Automotive
Products, and Digital Satellite Systems.
I am TIRED of having my GOOD NAME Libeled and cause me to LOSE
Business because of FELON CRIMINALS NAMED: Glenn Chartrand,
Slavetrainer, Dupas, Kristofer D Danner and BJ Nash.
I DARE ANY USER OF THIS NEWSGROUP to go to the ONLINE DATABASE, PAY
the FEE and do a FELON SEARCH for Convicted Felons, and LOSE their
money when they FIND OUT that I HAVE NEVER BEEN CONVICTED OF ANY
FELONY, and there are NO CRIMINAL CHARGES EVER FILED AGAINST ME!!!!!
Glenn Chartrand and the others like to do what they can because they
are losing buisness because I'm getting their emails shut down!!!
Glenn Chartrand sends one email calling me a stalker...
I HAVE FORWARDED TO THE ABUSE DEPARTMENTS OF ALL HIS SERVERS, NOT ONE,
NOT TWO, BUT ONE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED FIFTY EIGHT OBSCENE, HARASSING
EMAILS, AND THE LAW IS CLEAR:
Illinois Stalking Law
Public Act 92-0199
SB233 Enrolled LRB9207519ARsb AN ACT concerning criminal law.
Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, represented in
the General Assembly: Section 5. The Criminal Code of 1961 is amended
by adding Section 12-7.5 as follows: (720 ILCS 5/12-7.5 new) Sec.
12-7.5. Cyberstalking.
(a) A person commits cyberstalking when he or she, knowingly and
without lawful justification, on at least 2 separate occasions,
harasses another person through the use of electronic communication
and:
(1) at any time transmits a threat of immediate or future bodily harm,
sexual assault, confinement, or restraint and the threat is directed
towards that person or a family member of that person, or
(2) places that person or a family member of that person in reasonable
apprehension of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault,
confinement, or restraint.
(b) As used in this Section: "Harass" means to engage in a knowing and
willful course of conduct directed at a specific person that alarms,
torments, or terrorizes that person. "Electronic communication" means
any transfer of signs, signals, writings, sounds, data, or
intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire,
radio, electronmagnetic, photoelectric, or photo-optical system.
"Electronic communication" includes transmissions by a computer
through the Internet to another computer.
(c) Sentence. Cyberstalking is a Class 4 felony. A second or
subsequent conviction for cyberstalking is a Class 3 felony. Section
99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon becoming law. Passed in
the General Assembly May 08, 2001. Approved August 01, 2001.
CRIMINAL OFFENSES
(720 ILCS 135/) Harassing and Obscene Communications Act.
(720 ILCS 135/0.01) (from Ch. 134, par. 16.3h)
Sec. 0.01. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Harassing and
Obscene Communications Act.
(Source: P.A. 90-578, eff. 6-1-98.)
(720 ILCS 135/1) (from Ch. 134, par. 16.4)
Sec. 1. Any person in this State who sends messages or uses
language or terms which are obscene, lewd or immoral with the intent
to offend by means of or while using a telephone or telegraph
facilities, equipment or wires of any person, firm or corporation
engaged in the transmission of news or messages between states or
within the State of Illinois is guilty of a Class B misdemeanor. The
use of language or terms which are obscene, lewd or immoral is prima
facie evidence of the intent to offend.
(Source: P.A. 77-2620.)
(720 ILCS 135/1-1) (from Ch. 134, par. 16.4-1)
Sec. 1-1. Harassment by telephone). Harassment by telephone is use
of telephone communication for any of the following purposes:
(1) Making any comment, request, suggestion or
proposal which is obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy or indecent
with an intent to offend; or
(2) Making a telephone call, whether or not
conversation ensues, with intent to abuse, threaten or harass any
person at the called number; or
(3) Making or causing the telephone of another
repeatedly to ring, with intent to harass any person at the
called number; or
(4) Making repeated telephone calls, during which
conversation ensues, solely to harass any person at the called
number; or
(4.1) Making a telephone call or knowingly inducing
a person to make a telephone call for the purpose of harassing
another person who is under 13 years of age, regardless of whether the
person under 13 years of age consents to the harassment, if the
defendant is at least 16 years of age at the time of the commission of
the offense; or
(5) Knowingly permitting any telephone under one's
control to be used for any of the purposes mentioned herein.
Every telephone directory published for distribution to members of
the general public shall contain a notice setting forth a summary of
the provisions of this Section. Such notice shall be printed in type
which is no smaller than any other type on the same page and shall be
preceded by the word "WARNING". All telephone companies in this State
shall cooperate with law enforcement agencies in using their
facilities and personnel to detect and prevent violations of this Act.
(Source: P.A. 91-878, eff. 1-1-01.)
(720 ILCS 135/1-2)
Sec. 1-2. Harassment through electronic communications.
(a) Harassment through electronic communications is the use of
electronic communication for any of the following purposes:
(1) Making any comment, request, suggestion or
proposal which is obscene with an intent to offend;
(2) Interrupting, with the intent to harass, the
telephone service or the electronic communication service of any
person;
(3) Transmitting to any person, with the intent to
harass and regardless of whether the communication is read in its
entirety or at all, any file, document, or other communication which
prevents that person from using his or her telephone service or
electronic communications device;
(3.1) Transmitting an electronic communication or
knowingly inducing a person to transmit an electronic
communication for the purpose of harassing another person who is under
13 years of age, regardless of whether the person under 13 years of
age consents to the harassment, if the defendant is at least 16 years
of age at the time of the commission of the offense;
(4) Threatening injury to the person or to the
property of the person to whom an electronic communication is
directed or to any of his or her family or household members; or
(5) Knowingly permitting any electronic
communications device to be used for any of the purposes
mentioned in this subsection (a).
(b) As used in this Act:
(1) "Electronic communication" means any transfer of
signs, signals, writings, images, sounds, data or intelligence of
any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio,
electromagnetic, photoelectric or photo-optical system.
(2) "Family or household member" includes spouses,
former spouses, parents, children, stepchildren and other persons
related by blood or by present or prior marriage, persons who share or
formerly shared a common dwelling, persons who have or allegedly share
a blood relationship through a child, persons who have or have had a
dating or engagement relationship, and persons with disabilities and
their personal assistants. For purposes of this Act, neither a casual
acquaintanceship nor ordinary fraternization between 2 individuals in
business or social contexts shall be deemed to constitute a dating
relationship.
(Source: P.A. 90-578, eff. 6-1-98; 91-878, eff. 1-1-01.)
(720 ILCS 135/1-3)
Sec. 1-3. Evidence inference. Evidence that a defendant made
additional telephone calls or engaged in additional electronic
communications after having been requested by a named complainant or
by a family or household member of the complainant to stop may be
considered as evidence of an intent to harass unless disproved by
evidence to the contrary.
(Source: P.A. 90-578, eff. 6-1-98.)
(720 ILCS 135/1-4)
Sec. 1-4. Psychiatric examination. The court may order any person
convicted under this Act to submit to a psychiatric examination.
(Source: P.A. 90-578, eff. 6-1-98.)
(720 ILCS 135/2) (from Ch. 134, par. 16.5)
Sec. 2. Sentence.
(a) Except as provided in subsection (b), a person who violates
any of the provisions of Section 1, 1-1, or 1-2 of this Act is guilty
of a Class B misdemeanor. Except as provided in subsection (b), a
second or subsequent violation of Section 1, 1-1, or 1-2 of this Act
is a Class A misdemeanor, for which the court shall impose a minimum
of 14 days in jail or, if public or community service is established
in the county in which the offender was convicted, 240 hours of public
or community service.
(b) In any of the following circumstances, a person who violates
Section 1, 1-1, or 1-2 of this Act shall be guilty of a Class 4
felony:
(1) The person has 3 or more prior violations in the
last 10 years of harassment by telephone under Section 1-1 of
this Act, harassment through electronic communications under Section
1-2 of this Act, or any similar offense of any state;
(2) The person has previously violated the
harassment by telephone provisions of Section 1-1 of this Act or
the harassment through electronic communications provisions of Section
1-2 of this Act or committed any similar offense in any state with the
same victim or a member of the victim's family or household;
(3) At the time of the offense, the offender was
under conditions of bail, probation, mandatory supervised release
or was the subject of an order of protection, in this or any other
state, prohibiting contact with the victim or any member of the
victim's family or household;
(4) In the course of the offense, the offender
threatened to kill the victim or any member of the victim's
family or household;
(5) The person has been convicted in the last 10
years of a forcible felony as defined in Section 2-8 of the
Criminal Code of 1961; or
(6) The person violates paragraph (4.1) of Section
1-1 or paragraph (3.1) of subsection (a) of Section 1-2.
(Source: P.A. 90-578, eff. 6-1-98; 91-878, eff. 1-1-01.)